Author:
Hashim Lim Noor Hashimah,Teh Bor Tsong,Nik Hashim Nik Hazwani,Supramanian Rama Krishna,Baharudin Urwatul Wusqa
Abstract
The current modal share between private and public transport in Malaysia still falls short of its 50:50 goal. The continued reliance on private transport for workplace travel faces further aggravation in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. Aiming to understand this concern, this study pursued two key objectives; (i) to explore shifts in transport mode choices before and after Covid-19; and (ii) to identify the significant factors influencing these shifts. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, focusing specifically on workplace commuting (n=113). The McNemar’s test was used to determine the significance of transport mode shifts from public to private transport and vice versa, while the Mann-Whitney U test was employed to determine the significance of various factors on these shifts. Four primary factors were examined: cost, accessibility, comfort, and hygiene concerns. The findings showed that (i) a discernible shift in transport modes occurred (Q= 38.72, p>.05), with a notable trend of individuals transitioning from public to private transport due to the Covid-19 pandemic; (ii) hygiene concerns (mean rank= 72.36, U= 807.0, p<.000) and comfort (mean rank= 64.73, U= 1188.5, p= .013) emerged as statistically significant influencers of this shift; and (iii) while cost (mean rank= 65.28, U= 1053.5, p= .001) is an important determinant of transport mode preferences, it was not found to be a significant factor driving mode shifts. A comprehensive examination of pandemic-induced transport mode preferences yields crucial insights for shaping transportation infrastructure and services, facilitating sustainable development in line with UN SDGs. Understanding these influences is vital for effective policy-making and achieving desired modal shares.
Publisher
Malaysian Institute of Planners
Subject
Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference25 articles.
1. Brussel, M., Zuidgeest, M., Pfeffer, K., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2019). Access or accessibility? A critique of the urban transport SDG indicator. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(2), 67.
2. Bursa Malaysia (2020). Malaysia’s Public Transportation Sector & Reviving Malaysia’s Infrastructure Privatisation. https://www.bursamalaysia.com/sites/5d809dcf39fba22790cad230/assets/5f17bd a439fba224819e094d/Session_1_IMKL2020_V2.pdf
3. Cheng, C. (2020). COVID-19 in Malaysia: Economic impacts & fiscal responses. Institute of Strategic and International Studies, Malaysia.
4. Deuskar, C., Baker, J. L., & Mason, D. (2015). East Asia's changing urban landscape: Measuring a decade of spatial growth. World Bank Publications.
5. Dulac, J. (2013). Global land transport infrastructure requirements. Paris: International Energy Agency, 20, 2014.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献