Triple-negative breast cancer: from classical clinicopathological features to androgen receptor profile
-
Published:2024-07-15
Issue:2
Volume:65
Page:209-216
-
ISSN:1220-0522
-
Container-title:Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Rom J Morphol Embryol
Author:
,Prutianu Iulian,Giuşcă Simona Eliza, ,Gafton Bogdan, ,Chifu Mariana Bianca, ,Terinte Cristina, ,Antonescu Alexandra, ,Popovici Larisa, ,Căruntu Irina-Draga,
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (BC) represents an extensively analyzed entity to establish the overall framework of clinicopathological characteristics, with an impact on defining prognostic and predictive factors. The relationship between triple-negative BC and androgen receptor (AR) is far from being clarified. We aimed to evaluate the classical clinicopathological spectrum that characterized a triple-negative BC, focusing on AR expression. The study group comprised 124 cases of triple-negative BC. The main clinicopathological parameters were extracted from medical records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) exam was run using the following antibodies: anti-estrogen receptor (ER), anti-progesterone receptor (PR), anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2/neu), anti-Ki67 and anti-AR. AR immunoexpression was assessed as absent (completely negative) or present (unrelated to percentages and intensity). Data were statistically analyzed. AR expression was positive in 78 (63%) cases and negative in 46 (37%) cases. Among the study group, 28 cases exhibited an AR percentage ranging from 1% to 10%, 15 cases showed a percentage between 11% and 50%, while 12 cases had AR values between 51% and 75% and 23 cases fell within the AR range of 76% to 100%. No significant differences between AR immunoexpression (negative versus positive), clinicopathological characteristics and survival parameters were found. Statistically significant differences were registered between histological type, tumor stage, distant metastasis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), treatment and residual cancer burden (RCB), and survival parameters. Thus, our results sustain that AR does not affect the biological behavior of triple-negative BC.
Publisher
Societatea Romana de Morfologie
Reference48 articles.
1. "[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 2. [2] Beňačka R, Szabóová D, Guľašová Z, Hertelyová Z, Radoňák J. Classic and new markers in diagnostics and classification of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(21):5444. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215444 3. [3] Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Global Cancer Observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Press, Lyon, France, 2024. https://gco.iarc.who.int/today 4. [4] Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 2000, 406(6797):747-752. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021093 5. [5] Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 2012, 490(7418):61-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11412
|
|