Abstract
Received March 31, 2023; revised June 6, 2023; accepted June 27, 2023Agreement between values of the mean monthly snow depth provided by the ERA 5-Land reanalysis and similar characteristics of snow cover calculated on the basis of the extended hydrometeorological monitoring performed in the Perm Region for 1990–2020 is analyzed. It was found that ERA 5-Land in 73% of cases reproduces the presence/absence of snow during the onset period, and in 53% – during the period of snow loss. The conclusions made in the authors' previous studies based on more limited material were generally confirmed. It is shown that the reanalysis values of the snow depth are overestimated in relation to instrumental measurements for most of the hydrometeorological stations of the Perm Region. In space, the magnitude of the reanalysis error increases from the southwest to the northeast of the region, with the exception of its central part, where the influence of the Kama water reservoir is perceptible. But the interannual variability of the average snow depth in the Perm Region was reproduced by the ERA 5-Land reanalysis adequately. For 30 years, the magnitude of the reanalysis error decreased as it was compared with 61% observation points. The analysis of seasonal variability showed that in ERA 5-Land time of the maximum snow depth was shifted to earlier onset. The complete coincidence of the seasonal course was recorded only in 5% of hydrometeorological monitoring sites. The value of the average monthly discrepancies between the data of the reanalysis and the information of the posts as a whole exceeds the similar characteristic for the stations, which is especially evident during the period of active snowmelt.
Publisher
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference29 articles.
1. Astafurov V.G., Evsyutkin T.V., Kuryanovich K.V., Skorokhodov A.V. Statistical models of image texture and physical parameters of cloudiness during snow cover periods on the Russian Federation territory from MODIS data. Optika atmosfery i okeana Optics of the atmosphere and ocean 2018, 31 (7): 537–541. https://doi.org/10.15372/AOO20180706 [In Russian].
2. Bulygina O.N., Razuvaev V.N., Aleksandrova T.M. Description of the data array characteristics of snow cover at meteorological stations in Russia and the former USSR" Certificate of state registration of the database No. 2014621201. Retrieved from: http://meteo.ru/data/165-snow-cover#opisanie-massiva-dannykh (Last access: 26 January 2023) [In Russian].
3. Grigorev V.YU., Frolova N.L., Kireeva M.B., Stepanenko V.M. Spatial and temporal variability of ERA5 precipitation accuracy over Russia. Izvestiya RAN. Ser. geogr. Proc. of the RAS. Geographical series. 2022, 86 (3): 435–446. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556622030062 [In Rus- sian].
4. Evseeva N.S., Petrov A.I., Kashiro M.A., Kvasnikova Z.N., Batmanova A.S., Khon A.V. Influence of the relief and vegetation on the distribution of the snow cover in the pools of small rivers. Geosfernye issledovaniya. Geospheric Research. 2017, 4: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.17223/25421379/5/6 [In Russian].
5. Kazakova E.V. Yezhednevnaya otsenka lokal’nykh znacheniy i ob”yektivnyy analiz kharakteristik snezhnogo pokrova v ramkakh sistemy chislennogo prognoza pogody COSMO-Ru. Daily assessment of local values and objective analysis of snow cover characteristics in the framework of the COSMO-Ru numerical weather forecast system. PhD. Moscow: Hydrometeorol. scientific-research center of Russia. 2015: 181 p. [In Russian].