Subjective well-being: the problem of analyzing population qualitative heterogeneity (part 1)

Author:

Kuchenkova Anna V.1,Tatarova Galina G.1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Abstract

The article discusses importance of the methodological problem of analyzing the qualitative heterogeneity of a set of objects in the process of sociological measuring of subjective well-being. It presents the results of an exploratory study aimed at testing a number of tools in procedures of reconstructing social types among the population as qualitatively homogeneous latent formations (according to the nature of subjective well-being). Taking as preconditions, the authors proceed from the existence of five group problems of a theoretical and methodological nature, the formulation and solution of which presumably contribute to developing a methodology for studying qualitative heterogeneity. This part of the article, first, substantiates the existence of a request for methodological reflecting the use of generalized indicators of subjective well-being (life satisfaction, personal happiness) in mass surveys, the importance of the transition to multidimensional models of measurement and analysis implemented within the conceptual framework of the typological method of social knowledge. Second, the complete set of particular indicators and the logic of their selection for typological analysis are offered (the results will be presented in the second part of the article). Third, the problem of studying the relationship between indicators of subjective well-being is raised from the perspective of forming the basis for the typology.

Publisher

The Russian Academy of Sciences

Reference37 articles.

1. Balatsky Y. V. (2005) Life Satisfaction Factors: Measurement and Integral Indicators. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion]. No. 4(76): 42–52. (In Russ.)

2. Bessokirnaya G. G., Temnitsky A. L. (2000) Workers at a private enterprise: life satisfaction. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 33–37. (In Russ.)

3. Bojanowska A., Zalewska A. M. (2016) Lay Understanding of Happiness and the Experience of Well-Being: Are Some Conceptions of Happiness More Beneficial than Others? Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 17: 793–815.

4. Cummins R. A., Eckersley R. et al. (2003) Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 64: 159–190.

5. Cummins R. A. (1996) The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 38. Iss. 3: 303–328.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3