Tactile localization accuracy at the low back
-
Published:2024-02-08
Issue:3
Volume:86
Page:1008-1021
-
ISSN:1943-3921
-
Container-title:Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atten Percept Psychophys
Author:
Pratt Simon,Wand Benedict M.,Hince Dana A.,Travers Mervyn J.,Schneider Lee,Kelly Sara,Gibson William
Abstract
AbstractLocalizing tactile stimulation is an important capability for everyday function and may be impaired in people with persistent pain. This study sought to provide a detailed description of lumbar spine tactile localization accuracy in healthy individuals. Sixty-nine healthy participants estimated where they were touched at nine different points, labelled in a 3 × 3 grid over the lumbar spine. Mislocalization between the perceived and actual stimulus was calculated in horizontal (x) and vertical (y) directions, and a derived hypotenuse (c) mislocalization was calculated to represent the direct distance between perceived and actual points. In the horizontal direction, midline sites had the smallest mislocalization. Participants exhibited greater mislocalization for left- and right-sided sites, perceiving sites more laterally than they actually were. For all vertical values, stimulated sites were perceived lower than reality. A greater inaccuracy was observed in the vertical direction. This study measured tactile localization for the low back utilizing a novel testing method. The large inaccuracies point to a possible distortion in the underlying perceptual maps informing the superficial schema; however, further testing comparing this novel method with an established tactile localization task, such as the point-to-point method, is suggested to confirm these findings.
Funder
The University of Notre Dame Australia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Adamczyk, W., Sługocka, A., Saulicz, O., & Saulicz, E. (2016). The point-to-point test: A new diagnostic tool for measuring lumbar tactile acuity? Inter and intra-examiner reliability study of pain-free subjects. Manual Therapy, 22, 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2015.12.012 2. Adamczyk, W., Luedtke, K., & Saulicz, E. (2018a). Lumbar tactile acuity in patients with low back pain and healthy controls: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 34(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000499 3. Adamczyk, W. M., Luedtke, K., Saulicz, O., & Saulicz, E. (2018b). Sensory dissociation in chronic low back pain: Two case reports. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 34(8), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1423431 4. Adamczyk, W. M., Sługocka, A., Mehlich, K., Saulicz, E., & Luedtke, K. (2019). Preliminary validation of a two-point estimation task for the measurement of sensory dissociation in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 20(12), 2472–2478. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny220 5. Bagg, M. K., Wand, B. M., Cashin, A. G., Lee, H., Hübscher, M., Stanton, T. R., O’Connell, N. E., O’Hagan, E. T., Rizzo, R. R., & Wewege, M. A. (2022). Effect of graded sensorimotor retraining on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 328(5), 430–439.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|