Abstract
AbstractInfants cannot be instructed where to look; therefore, infant researchers rely on observation of their participant’s gaze to make inferences about their cognitive processes. They therefore started studying infant attention in the real world from early on. Developmental researchers were early adopters of methods combining observations of gaze and behaviour with electroencephalography (EEG) to study attention and other cognitive functions. However, the direct combination of eye-tracking methods and EEG to test infants is still rare, as it includes specific challenges. The current article reviews the development of co-registration research in infancy. It points out specific challenges of co-registration in infant research and suggests ways to overcome them. It ends with recommendations for implementing the co-registration of EEG and eye-tracking in infant research to maximise the benefits of the two measures and their combination and to orient on Open Science principles while doing so. In summary, this work shows that the co-registration of EEG and eye-tracking in infant research can be beneficial to studying natural and real-world behaviour despite its challenges.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference133 articles.
1. Ahtola, E., Stjerna, S., Stevenson, N., & Vanhatalo, S. (2017). Use of eye tracking improves the detection of evoked responses to complex visual stimuli during EEG in infants. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 81–90.
2. Andrade, C. (2021). HARKing, cherry-picking, p-hacking, fishing expeditions, and data dredging and mining as questionable research practices. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 82(1), 25941.
3. Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(2), 191–206.
4. Aslin, R. N. (2009). How infants view natural scenes gathered from a head-mounted camera. Optometry and Vision Science, 86(6), 561–565.
5. Atkinson, J., & Hood, B. (1993). Gap effects on saccadic latency in infants and children. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(3), 568–569.