Author:
Strommer Nofar,Okon-Singer Hadas,Gabay Shai
Abstract
AbstractWhile executive functions (EFs) have traditionally been linked to the cerebral cortex, our understanding of EFs has evolved with increasing evidence pointing to the involvement of cortico-subcortical networks. Despite the importance of investigating EFs within this broader context, the functional contributions of subcortical regions to these processes remain largely unexplored. This study addresses this gap by specifically examining the involvement of subcortical regions in executive inhibition, as measured by the classic Eriksen flanker task. In this study, we used a stereoscope to differentiate between subcortical (monocular) and cortical (mostly binocular) visual pathways in EF processes. Our findings indicate that monocular visual pathways play a crucial role in representing executive conflict, which necessitates cortical involvement. The persistence of a monoptic advantage in conflict representation highlights the substantial contribution of subcortical regions to these executive processes. This exploration of subcortical involvement in executive inhibition provides valuable insights into the intricate relationships between cortical and subcortical regions in EFs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 17–42.
2. Anil, K., Hall, S. D., Demain, S., Freeman, J. A., Ganis, G., & Marsden, J. (2021). A systematic review of neurofeedback for the management of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1292.
3. Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Cortical networks for inhibitory control: Evidence from fMRI. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 351–383.
4. Bellebaum, C., & Daum, I. (2007). Cerebellar involvement in executive control. The Cerebellum, 6, 184–192.
5. Booth, J. N., Boyle, J. M., & Kelly, S. W. (2014). The relationship between inhibition and working memory in predicting children’s reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 84–101.