The role of trial tracking in rats’ working memory-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The role of trial tracking in rats’ working memory

Published:1999-06 Issue:2 Volume:27 Page:211-220
ISSN:0090-4996
Container-title:Animal Learning & Behavior
language:en
Short-container-title:Animal Learning & Behavior

Author:

Cohen J. S.,Njegovan M.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Animal Science and Zoology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03199677.pdf

Reference27 articles.

1. Cohen, J. S., &Armstrong, D. L. (1996). Sources of intertrial proactive interference in rats’ short-term memory in a delayed successive matching-to-sample modality discrimination.Learning & Motivation,27, 485–499.

2. Cohen, J. S., &Roberts, R. (1996). The role of trial tracking on rats’ successive delayed matching-to-sample modality performance.Behavioral Processes,36, 277–287.

3. Edhouse, W. V., &White, K. G. (1988). Sources of proactive interference in animal memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 56–70.

4. Fetterman, J. G., &MacEwen, D. (1989). Short-term memory for responses: The “choose-small” effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,52, 311–324.

5. Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s Law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Delayed matching-to-position performance in C57BL/6N mice;Behavioural Processes;2010-06

2. Spatial memory in rats after 25 hours;Learning and Motivation;2008-11

3. Rats’ memory for event duration in delayed matching-to-sample with nonspatial comparison response alternatives;Behavioural Processes;2008-05

4. Asymmetrical retention functions for sequences of light flashes or tone bursts in the rat;Learning and Motivation;2008-05

5. Memory for sequences of tone bursts in the rat: Reliance on temporal cues and evidence for an instructional ambiguity explanation of the choose-few effect;Learning and Motivation;2007-11