The Multiple Object Avoidance (MOA) task measures attention for action: Evidence from driving and sport
-
Published:2021-11-16
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1554-3528
-
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav Res
Author:
Mackenzie Andrew K.ORCID, Vernon Mike L., Cox Paul R., Crundall David, Daly Rosie C., Guest Duncan, Muhl-Richardson Alexander, Howard Christina J.
Abstract
AbstractPerformance in everyday tasks, such as driving and sport, requires allocation of attention to task-relevant information and the ability to inhibit task-irrelevant information. Yet there are individual differences in this attentional function ability. This research investigates a novel task for measuring attention for action, called the Multiple Object Avoidance task (MOA), in its relation to the everyday tasks of driving and sport. The aim in Study 1 was to explore the efficacy of the MOA task to predict simulated driving behaviour and hazard perception. Whilst also investigating its test–retest reliability and how it correlates to self-report driving measures. We found that superior performance in the MOA task predicted simulated driving performance in complex environments and was superior at predicting performance compared to the Useful Field of View task. We found a moderate test–retest reliability and a correlation between the attentional lapses subscale of the Driving Behaviour Questionnaire. Study 2 investigated the discriminative power of the MOA in sport by exploring performance differences in those that do and do not play sports. We also investigated if the MOA shared attentional elements with other measures of visual attention commonly attributed to sporting expertise: Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) and cognitive processing speed. We found that those that played sports exhibited superior MOA performance and found a positive relationship between MOA performance and Multiple Object Tracking performance and cognitive processing speed. Collectively, this research highlights the utility of the MOA when investigating visual attention in everyday contexts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference99 articles.
1. Adan, A. (2012). Cognitive performance and dehydration. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 31(2), 71–78. 2. Aksan, N., Sager, L., Hacker, S., Lester, B., Dawson, J., Rizzo, M., Ebe, K., & Foley, J. (2017). Individual differences in cognitive functioning predict effectiveness of a heads-up lane departure warning for younger and older drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99, 171–183. 3. Alberti, C. F., Horowitz, T., Bronstad, P. M., Bowers, A. R. (2014) Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study. PLoS One 9(2): e89381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089381 4. Ball, K., Owsley, C., Sloane, M. E., Roenker, D. L., & Bruni, J. R. (1993). Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 34, 3110–3123. 5. Ball, K., Roenker, D. L., & Bruni, J. R. (1990). Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. Advances in Psychology, 69, 489–508.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|