Abstract
Although a reliable relative chronology, based chiefly on the sequence of pottery types, is rapidly being built up for the Andean area, no method has so far been devised for turning the relative dates into absolute ones. As far as we know at present, no permanent method of dating, comparable to the Maya Long Count or even to the Mexican fifty-two-year cycle, was in use in any part of South America, and no one has yet investigated the possibility of building up a tree-ring sequence, even in the drier regions of Peru. Furthermore, the distances that separate the Andean area from the Maya area have so far prevented any correlation of the early pottery types of the two areas, so that we cannot even estimate the age of Peruvian remains in terms of the insecurely correlated Maya calendar.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Archaeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference46 articles.
1. La Capaccuna de Montesinos después de cien afios de discusiones e Hipótesis.;IMBELLONI;Anales del Institute) de Etnografia Americana,1941
2. CALANCHA ANTONIO DE LA 1638. Coronica Moralizada del orden de San Avgvstin en el Pen, con sveesos egenplares en esta monarqyia. Barcelona.
3. TSCHOPIK MARION H. N.D. Some Notes on the Archaeology of the Department of Puno. MS. to be published in the Papers of the Peabody Museum.
Cited by
97 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献