Racial differences in contraceptive choice: Complexity and implications

Author:

Stephen Elizabeth Hervey1,Rindfuss Ronald R.2,Bean Frank D.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Demography, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057

2. Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

3. Department of Sociology and Population Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712

Abstract

Abstract Previous research has failed to generate consensus about why black fertility has persistently exceeded that of whites in the United States. In an effort to shed light on this question, this article examines black/white differences in sociodemographic factors affecting contraceptive choice. Using data from the 1976 and 1982 National Surveys of Family Growth, we find a complex pattern of black/white differences. Not only does contraceptive choice vary by race, but the effects of such variables as age, marital status, and education also differ between blacks and whites. For example, compared with whites, black married women avoid coital methods, and compared with blacks, white women shift contraceptive behavior more as they change marital status. The complex nature of the racial differences in contraceptive choice are interpreted as reflecting differences in marriage patterns and trends.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Demography

Reference63 articles.

1. Contraceptive practice among Americanwomen, 1973–1982;Bachrach;Family Planning Perspectives,1984

2. Differential fertility and the minoritygroup statushypothesis: An assessment and review;Bean,1978

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Residential segregation and the fertility of immigrants and their descendants;Population, Space and Place;2017-10-02

2. In Search of Reasons for the Comparatively Higher Fertility among Muslim Women in Delhi, India: Postulating a Cultural Hypothesis;Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs;2012-12

3. References;Inequalities of Love;2011

4. Notes;Inequalities of Love;2011

5. Conclusion;Inequalities of Love;2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3