Author:
Simma Bruno,Paulus Andreas L.
Abstract
When we were invited to contribute a positivist perspective to the present symposium, we did not know whether to regard this invitation as flattering or as an insult: does positivism not represent old-fashioned, conservative, continental European nineteenthcentury views—naive ideas of dead white males on the possibility of objectivity in law and morals? There is little we can do about being male and white, but we have certainly not seen ourselves as positivists of that kind. From the range of methodologies that the editors assembled, we could associate ourselves with several approaches just as much as with positivism. But in reflecting on our day-to-day legal work, we realized that, for better or for worse, we indeed employ the tools developed by the “positivist” tradition.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
134 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Denationalisation and Its Discontents;IMMIGRAT ASYL LAW;2023-01-01
2. Solidarity as an International Legal Norm;Global Europe: Legal and Policy Issues of the EU’s External Action;2023
3. Law’s Memory between Theory and Practice;SSRN Electronic Journal;2023
4. Legal Positivism: International;Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy;2023
5. Justice: And International Law;Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy;2023