Abstract
The European Parliament under the current cooperation procedure has an important power: it can make proposals that, if accepted by the Commission of the European Communities, are easier for the Council of Ministers to accept than to modify, since only qualified majority is required for acceptance, whereas full unanimity for modification. The importance of this power, which I call the power of the conditional agenda setter, has not been recognized in previous scholarly work. For structural reasons explained in the text, this power is likely to increase in the future. I conclude by arguing that the conditional delegation of power to international actors (the European Parliament, Commission, and the Court of Justice) is a frequent phenomenon in European institutions. This delegation presents three important advantages: it makes possible the selection of one among many possible equilibria, it accelerates European integration, and it diffuses responsibility for politically unpopular measures.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Europe as a Confederation: the Community and the Nation-State
2. Tsebelis George , and Money Jeannette . N.d. “Bicameral Negotiations: The Navette System in France.” British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
3. Stephen R. 1992. “Domestic Interests, Interstate Bargains, and European Integration: The Case of the Automobile Sector.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Cited by
509 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献