The Cognitive Reality of Hierarchic Structure in Tonal and Atonal Music

Author:

Dibben Nicola

Abstract

Three experiments that form an empirical basis for discussing the cognitive reality of hierarchic structure in music are reported. The first experiment showed evidence of listeners' ability to match a performed reduction of an extract of tonal music to the piece of music from which it was derived. A second experiment showed that this choice of reduction could not be attributed to the relative " coherence" of reductions. These two experiments provide evidence for the internal representation of tonal music in terms of a hierarchy of events such as that proposed by Lerdahl and Jackendoff ( 1983). In a third experiment using atonal music, subjects were less successful in choosing as the best reduction that which resembled the extract at higher levels of the structural hierarchy. Thus there is no evidence for the perception of a hierarchy of events in atonal music of the sort proposed by Lerdahl (1989). This empirical work therefore suggests that whereas the tonal system allows events within a tonal work to be heard within a strict hierarchy, no such hierarchy exists for atonal music. This finding has two main implications. First, a new conception of the term "prolongation" is needed if it is to apply to atonal music. The lack of a pitch hierarchy means that atonal events are unable to "stand for" other events in the way that tonal events are, and it is this action of standing for that allows prolongation to occur. Second, if as this research suggests, atonal music is not perceived in terms of a hierarchic structure, then another approach may be to investigate associational properties of the music and the role that these play in the formation of a structural representation.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Music

Reference9 articles.

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3