Abstract
The evidence of Minoan and Mycenaean trade with and settlement in Anatolia has never been comprehensively studied. Bittel (1967:5–23), Buchholz (1974:365–8), Cook and Blackman (1959–60:39–50, 1964–5:44–55, 1970–1:39–53), D. French (1969:73–4), Hiller (1975:406–11), Hope Simpson and Lazenby (1973:174–9), Lloyd and Mellaart (1955:81–3), Mellaart (1968:187–90) and Stubbings (1951:22–4 and 88–9) have discussed some of the sites involved but not in depth. Obviously it is only by considering the evidence as a whole that a definitive assessment is possible, so that a further study is not superfluous.Problems arising from the decipherment of the Boğazköy/Hattusas archives are not considered but I would hope that this study might nevertheless assist those concerned with the political geography of Anatolia in the second millennium.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History,Cultural Studies,Archeology
Reference232 articles.
1. Archaeology in Greece, 1922–24
2. Die Ausgrabung beim Athena-Temple in Milet 1957 – III: Der Westabschnitt;Weickert;Ist. Mitt.,1959
3. Miletus;Weickert;AS,1958
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Selçuk Ayasuluk Tepesi’nden Bir Grup Miken Seramiği;International Journal of Ancient History;2023-09-12
2. Ionia;A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean;2019-11-29
3. Ramesses III and the ‘Sea-peoples’: Towards a New Philistine Paradigm;Oxford Journal of Archaeology;2017-07-17
4. THE MINOAN AMPHOROID KRATER: FROM PRODUCTION TO CONSUMPTION;The Annual of the British School at Athens;2015-07-21
5. Müskebi;The Encyclopedia of Ancient History;2015-06-30