Author:
Peluso Nancy Lee,Vandergeest Peter
Abstract
How have national and state governments the world over come to “own” huge expanses of territory under the rubric of “national forest,” “national parks,” or “wastelands”? The two contradictory statements in the above epigraph illustrate that not all colonial administrators agreed that forests should be taken away from local people and “protected” by the state. The assumption of state authority over forests is based on a relatively recent convergence of historical circumstances. These circumstances have enabled certain state authorities to supersede the rights, claims, and practices of people resident in what the world now calls “forests.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference206 articles.
1. Gifts and Rights: Cautionary Notes on Community Self-help in Thailand
2. Through a Green Lens: The Construction of Customary Environmental Law and Community in Indonesia's Maluku Islands;Zerner;Law and Society Review,1990
Cited by
341 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献