Abstract
One of the most interesting and seminal figures in Soviet historiography is the historian M. N. Pokrovsky, whose influence has continued to be felt up to the present day. He was active in the 1917 Revolution in Russia, and in political and institutional developments during the first decade and a half of Soviet rule. He became what may be euphemistically called the "dean" of Marxist historians, yet after his death on April 10, 1932, he was ritually accused of being responsible for most of the "shortcomings" of Soviet historiography. Among the many accusations leveled against Pokrovsky the following have appeared with considerable regularity: (1) Because he was "dictator" of the historical front from 1928 to 1932, his interpretations of history were the "official" interpretations of that time and consequently had to be "reflected" by other Soviet historians.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Cultural Studies
Reference35 articles.
1. Istochnikovedenie i izuchenie istorii sovetskogo obshchestva,;Danilov;Voprosy istorii,1961
2. M. N. Pokrovsky,;Hoetzsch;Zeitschrift fiir osteuropäische Geschichte,1932
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bibliography;The Last Heroes of Leningrad;2022-08-08
2. Sources et bibliographie;Les individus face aux crises du XXe siècle;2005-01-20
3. M. N. Pokrovskij in Soviet and Western historical research: An outline of a research study;Scando-Slavica;1987-01