The Validity of Survey Responses on Abortion: Evidence from Estonia

Author:

Anderson Barbara A.1,Katus Kalev2,Puur Allan2,Silver Brian D.3

Affiliation:

1. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 1225 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

2. Estonian Inter-University Population Research Center, P.O. Box 3012, Tallinn 200090, Estonia

3. Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents results of a validation survey of abortion conducted in Tallinn, Estonia in April and May 1992. The sample was drawn from patient records in a maternity hospital. Women who had an abortion in that hospital in 1991 were asked about recent abortions as part of a survey about women’s health. More than 80% of the respondents reported having a recent abortion. Some respondents misreported their abortion as a miscarriage. Moreover, some variation in reporting was associated with respondents’ characteristics. Ethnic Estonians were less likely to report their abortion than were Russians, women over age 40 were less likely to report the abortion than younger women, and women who had the abortion late in the first trimester were less likely to report that abortion. There was some evidence that unmarried women were less likely than married women to report their abortion, and that women who had borne three or more children were less likely to report their abortion than women who had borne fewer children. These differences probably stem from the extent to which pregnancy or abortion is considered stigmatizing for women in different situations.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Demography

Reference19 articles.

1. Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-Reported Vote;Anderson;American Journal of Political Science,1986

2. The Validity of Survey Responses: Insights from Interviews of Married Couples in a Survey of Soviet Emigrants;Anderson;Social Forces,1987

3. Etnicheskaia differentsiia rozhdaemosti v SSSR;Bondarskaia;Vestnik statistiki,1988

4. Response Effects;Bradburn,1983

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3