Abstract
A Subject of warm debate in the convention which framed the Constitution of the United States was where the power of making or declaring war should be vested.The committee of detail reported in favor of giving Congress power “to make war.” Pinkney opposed this on the floor, preferring to bestow it on the Senate. That this was also the view of Hamilton appears in the draft of a constitution which he gave to Madison, towards the close of the convention. In the debate on the report, Pinkney urged that it “would be singular for one authority to make war, and another, peace.” Butler, who followed him, thought the President was the proper depositary. It was then moved to make the clause read “to declare war,” instead of “to make war.” Gerry said that he had “never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the executive alone to declare war.” Mason thought that neither the executive nor the Senate could safely be intrusted with the power of war; and finally the word declare was substituted for make by the large majority of States.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference2 articles.
1. International Law applied to the Russo-Japanese War;Takahashi;Journal
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Genealogy of Ultimata;The Use and Utility of Ultimata in Coercive Diplomacy;2023
2. Declaration of War: A Dead Letter or An Invitation to Struggle?;British Journal of American Legal Studies;2019-05-01
3. To Declare War;Duke Law Journal;1991-09