Al Qaeda, Terrorism, and Military Commissions

Author:

Wedgwood Ruth

Abstract

It is now more than an academic question whether one should regard terrorism as crime or as war. The attacks mounted by the Al Qaeda organization on September 11, 2001, were of unprecedented scale, heretofore seen only in wartime, killing three thousand people in a few hours’ time. Most victims were civilians, and most were Americans, yet the dead included people from eighty-seven countries. Had the emergency evacuation of the World Trade Center towers not run efficiently, as many as twenty-five thousand more might have died.The psychological sense that this was an act of war is founded on the extraordinary destructiveness of the act. In the past, even terrorism has evinced an implicit set of expectations—using violence to intimidate or gain publicity, targeting civilians so as to undermine the confidence placed in organized authority, but generally stopping short of this irrational magnitude of destruction. Only nihilism might seem to explain a scale of wreckage that serves no programmatic demands or political ambition.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference6 articles.

1. The Military Commission,;Green,1948

2. Ex-Prosecutor Wants Tribunals to Retain Liberties,;Weiser;N.Y. Times,2002

3. War and the Constitution: Bush’s Military Tribunals Haven’t Got a Legal Leg to Stand On,;P;Am. Prospect,2002

4. How Al Qaeda Agent Scouted Attack Sites in Israel and Egypt;Cullison;Account on Kabul Computer Matches Travels of Reid, the Alleged Shoe-Bomber,,2002

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Marketing Jihad: the rhetoric of recruitment;Journal of Marketing Management;2018-09-19

2. Engaging with the post-secular moment in post-9/11 Afghanistan: the search for a ‘humanist’ political discourse;Cambridge Review of International Affairs;2016-04-02

3. The laws of war and the state of the American exception;Review of International Studies;2009-07

4. Quo Vadis Guantanamo? Reflections on the U.S. Supreme Court's Boumediene Decision;European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice;2008

5. Non-State Actors and Terrorism;2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3