Desafios e possibilidades da jurimetria na judicialização em saúde: uma investigação em Minas Gerais do período 2014 a 2020

Author:

De Castro Mônica MonteiroORCID,Fernandes Gustavo LúciusORCID,Figueiredo Iara Veloso OliveiraORCID,Da Silva Gabriela Drummond MarquesORCID,De Miranda Wanessa DebôrtoliORCID,Junior Helvécio Miranda MagalhaesORCID,Dos Santos Fausto PereiraORCID,De Sousa Rômulo PaesORCID

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the health, drug, and antineoplastic drug lawsuits in Minas Gerais, in 2014 to 2020, from the comparison of different databases. Methodology: database pairing techniques were used to link lawsuits from the Minas Gerais State Court of Justice  with the processes received by the Minas Gerais Health State Department, the difficulties encountered in identifying and quantifying these processes were described, and the results found were compared with information from other sources. Results: in the Minas Gerais State Court of Justice databases, 564,763 health lawsuits were identified in the studied period. There was a significant increase in the number of processes until 2017 and a stabilization, at high levels, from 2017 onwards. In comparison with the results obtained by the Institute of Higher Education and Research and the Laboratory of Innovation, Intelligence and Sustainable Development Goals there was a great divergence in the number of processes found. Conclusion: taking the health judicialization against Minas Gerais state as an example, it was not possible to directly find all the processes received by Minas Gerais Health State Department in the various databases provided by the Minas Gerais State Court of Justice, requiring integration between the different databases and an additional search to identify all processes. Submission: 05/25/23| Review: 10/03/23| Approval: 10/04/23

Publisher

Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitario

Reference29 articles.

1. Vieira FS. Direito à saúde no Brasil: seus contornos, judicialização e a necessidade da macrojustiça. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. 2020; p. 76.

2. Insper. Judicialização da saúde no Brasil: perfil das demandas, causas e propostas de solução. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. 2019; p. 174.

3. Braga BSF, Oliveira Y, Ferreira MA. Gastos com a judicialização de medicamentos: uma revisão integrativa. Revista de Direito Sanitário. 2021; 21(3):22.

4. Anjos ECS, Ribeiro DC, Morais LV. Judicialização da saúde: uma revisão sistemática de literatura das iniciativas de diálogo institucional intersetorial. Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário. 2021;10(1):113–128.

5. Mapelli Júnior R. Judicialização da saúde: regime jurídico do SUS e intervenção na administração pública. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3