Abstract
Objective: to understand the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on aspects of quality of care provided to women in abortion situations in sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network (a multicenter network with international cooperation with the aim of encouraging good practices in Latin America and the Caribbean). Methods: cross-sectional study between January/2017 and December/2021 with women of any age admitted for abortion or miscarriage. We analyzed the total number of cases and the proportion of legal abortions. The dependent variables were complications and use of contraceptives after abortion. The independent variables were COVID-19 pandemic, clinical and sociodemographic data. Statistical analysis was carried out using linear regression, multiple Poisson regression, Cochran-Armitage, chi-square, Mann-Whitney and Cohen tests. Results: we analyzed data from 93689 women assisted in 12 sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network, 64.55% in the pre-pandemic period (NP) and 35.45% in the pandemic period (PP) (22.73% received post-abortion care and 77.27% legal abortion). We found no differences in the number of cases over the period, regardless of the legal context. We observed a significant increase in the proportion of legal abortions in liberal and moderate contexts. In NP, 46.46% of women underwent medical abortion, while 62.18% of women underwent medical abortion in PP (h-Cohen 0.32). We found no increase in the number of complications during PP. In NP, 79.12% started contraceptives after abortion, while in PP, 70.39% started contraceptives after abortion (h-Cohen 0.20). Conclusion: the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a decrease in the number of cases, a decrease in the proportion of legal interruptions, or an increase in complications in sentinel centers of the CLAP MUSA-Network.
Submission: 30/04/23|Review: 08/11/23|Approval: 09/11/23
Publisher
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitario
Reference46 articles.
1. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. OMS afirma que COVID-19 é agora caracterizada como pandemia; 11 mar. 2020. [cited in 04/17/2023]. Available at: https://www.paho.org/pt/news/11-3-2020-who-characterizes-covid-19-pandemic
2. Sachs JD, Karim SSA, Aknin L, et al. The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. Doi https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9
3. Cohen MA, Powell AM, Coleman JS, Keller JM, Livingston A, Anderson JR. Special ambulatory gynecologic considerations in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and implications for future practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):372-378. Doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.006
4. Spurlin EE, Han ES, Silver ER, et al. Where Have All the Emergencies Gone? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric and Gynecologic Procedures and Consults at a New York City Hospital. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021 Jul; 28(7):1411-1419. Doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.012
5. Wenham C, Smith J, Davies SE, Feng H, Grépin KA, Harman S, et al. Women are most affected by pandemics —lessons from past outbreaks. Nature 2020 Jul;583(7815):194–198. Doi https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02006-z
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献