Vulnerabilidade social no contexto da pandemia de COVID-19: uma discussão bioética

Author:

Alves Priscila DiasORCID,Seidl Eliane Maria FleuryORCID

Abstract

To analyze, from a bioethical perspective, social vulnerability in relation to health during the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Methods: The study included peer-reviewed publications from January 1st until December 31st 2020, identified in Pubmed, SciELO and LILACS data basis. Mesh terms were utilized for research in Pubmed as follows: “COVID-19” conjugated with the terms: “vulnerable population”, “population groups”, “social determinants of health”, “health equity”. Portuguese and Spanish equivalents DECS terms were used for searching in the other two databases. Results: a total of 132 articles were found. After applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, were 21 eligible articles. The most recurrent themes were: racial, ethnic and social-economics, gender, age, disability and chronic health conditions. Articles addressing more than one theme were observed, integrating different aspects of vulnerable populations. A bioethical discussion with focus in vulnerability based in the data retrieved took place and connections with discrimination and social determinants of health were made. Conclusion: Results point to the violation of rights explained in the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights. By increasing the disparity in morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 of population groups already impacted by the social determination of health, there is a violation of the right to health, indicating that governments and societies fail to respect the vulnerability of social groups in the pandemic context. Submission: 08/01/23| Review: 09/15/23| Approval: 09/18/23

Publisher

Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitario

Reference37 articles.

1. Callahan D, Jennings B. Ethics and Public health: forging a strong relationship. Am J Public Health [Internet]. 2002 [citado em 02 fev. 2021];92(2):169-176. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11818284/ Doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.2.169

2. Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, Ciência e Cultura. Declaração Universal sobre Bioética e Direitos Humanos da Unesco [Internet]. Tradução: Tapajós A, Prado MM, Garrafa V. Brasília: Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética; 2005 [citado em abr. 2021]. 12p. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_por

3. Ten Have H. Respect for Human vulnerability: the emergence of a new principle in Bioethics. J Bioeth Inq [Internet]. 2015 [citado em 02 fev. 2021]; (12):395-408. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26160601/ Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9641-9

4. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, 18 apr. 1979 [Internet]. Bethesda: Office of Human Subject Research; 1979 [citado em mar. 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

5. Levantezi M, Shimizu HE, Garrafa V. Princípio da não discriminação e não estigmatização: reflexões sobre hanseníase. Rev.bioét. [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 02 fev. 2021];28(1):17-23. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/bioet/a/SWNd6zNCNXhtW8cRByVq7dx/?format=pdf Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422020281362

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3