Productivity versus area

Author:

Chilibroste PabloORCID,Battegazzore GuillermoORCID,Fariña SantiagoORCID

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the development dynamic of the Uruguayan dairy farms in the last decade integrating country, experimental and commercial databases. A large commercial dairy farm database was segmented into four groups according to productivity and growth rate (PGR) during the fiscal years 2015/2016 to 2021/2022. Productivity growth rate was calculated as: PGR = (P2122/P1516)1/6-1, where: P2122 = productivity fiscal year 2021/22, and P1516 = productivity fiscal year 2015/2016. The PGR groups were defined as: negative (NPGR; PGR < 0% per year), low (LPGR; 0 ≤ PGR < 3%), medium (MPGR; 3 ≤ PGR ≤ 6%) and high productivity growth rate (HPGR; PGR ≥ 6%). A mixed model was used to evaluate productivity slope heterogeneity with fiscal year as a continuous variable, PGR group as categorical and their interaction. Farms that were able to increase productivity (M and H PGR) had higher mean productivity, pasture DMI and margin over feed cost vs. the less dynamic systems (N and L PGR). Larger changes in productivity (+64 and +27% for H and M PGR, respectively) were likely primarily due to changes in stocking rate (+20 to 30%) and in individual cow milk production (+10 to 20%). Production systems that increased productivity relied on increasing stocking rate and individual milk production based on more home-grown forage consumption. However, higher PGR was linked to lower initial values of productivity, which suggests decreasing returns as the dairy farms reached higher milk yields and forage DMI.

Publisher

Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía

Reference21 articles.

1. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences. Dairy [Internet]. Canberra: ABARES; 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/agricultural-outlook/dairy#daff-page-main

2. Chilibroste P, Battegazzore G. Dinámica bio-económica de los sistemas de producción de leche: Proyecto Producción Competitiva 2013 – 2018. Montevideo: Conaprole; 2019. 40p.

3. Clark DA, Caradus JR, Monaghan RM, Sharp P, Thorrold BS. Issues and options for future dairy farming in New Zealand. New Zeal J Agric Res. 2007;50:203-21. Doi: 10.1080/00288230709510291.

4. Durán H. Validacion de un sistema lechero de alta produccion por vaca y por ha de siembra directa. In: Siembra Directa para producción de leche. Montevideo: INIA; 2003. p. 38-47.

5. Durán H, La Manna A, Acosta Y, Mieres J. Propuestas validadas de INIA sobre alternativas para incrementar la producción de leche y/o sólidos por hectárea en forma rentable. Agrociencia. 2010;14(3):96-100. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.14.710.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3