Engaging stakeholders to design a comparative effectiveness trial in children with uncontrolled asthma

Author:

Erwin Kim1,Martin Molly A2,Flippin Tara1,Norell Sarah1,Shadlyn Ariana1,Yang Jie1,Falco Paula1,Rivera Jaime1,Ignoffo Stacy3,Kumar Rajesh4,Margellos-Anast Helen5,McDermott Michael6,McMahon Kate7,Mosnaim Giselle8,Nyenhuis Sharmilee M2,Press Valerie G9,Ramsay Jessica E5,Soyemi Kenneth10,Thompson Trevonne M2,Krishnan Jerry A211

Affiliation:

1. IIT Institute of Design, 350 N LaSalle, Chicago, IL 60654, USA

2. University of Illinois at Chicago, 1200 W Harrison St Chicago, IL 60607, USA

3. Chicago Asthma Consortium, PO Box 31757, Chicago, IL 60631, USA

4. Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611, USA

5. Sinai Health System, California Avenue, 15th Street, Chicago, IL 60608, USA

6. Illinois Emergency Department Asthma Surveillance Project (IEDASP)

7. Respiratory Health Association, 1440 W Washington Blvd, Chicago, IL 60607, USA

8. Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

9. University of Chicago, 5801 S Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, USA

10. John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W Harrison St Chicago, IL 60612, USA

11. University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 1740 W Taylor St Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Abstract

Aim: To present the methods and outcomes of stakeholder engagement in the development of interventions for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for uncontrolled asthma. Methods: We engaged stakeholders (caregivers, physicians, nurses, administrators) from six EDs in a three-phase process to: define design requirements; prototype and refine; and evaluate. Results: Interviews among 28 stakeholders yielded themes regarding in-home asthma management practices and ED discharge experiences. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation showed strong preference for the new discharge tool over current tools. Conclusion: Engaging end-users in contextual inquiry resulted in CAPE (CHICAGO Action Plan after ED discharge), a new stakeholder-balanced discharge tool, which is being tested in a multicenter comparative effectiveness trial.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Health Policy

Reference28 articles.

1. Comparative Effectiveness Research: National Institutes of Health. PCAST Session on Health Reform and CER (2009). www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ostp/PCAST/Nabel%20Presentation.pdf.

2. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Expert Panel Report 3: guidelines on asthma. www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/current/asthma-guidelines/full-report.

3. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). www.ginasthma.org/.

4. Asthma action plans are highly variable and do not conform to best visual design practices

5. Understanding what helps or hinders asthma action plan use: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3