Affiliation:
1. Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA
2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA
Abstract
The study’s purpose is to systematically review the scholarly literature about disinformation on social media, a space with enhanced concerns about nurturing propaganda and conspiracies. The systematic review methodology was applied to analyze 264 peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020, extracted from the Web of Science core collection database. Descriptive and bibliometric analysis techniques were used to document the findings. The analysis revealed an increase in the trend of publishing disinformation on social media and its impact on users’ cognitive responses from 2017 onwards. The USA appears to be the most influential node with its more significant role in advancing research on disinformation. The content analysis identified five psychosocial and political factors: influencing individual users’ perceptions, providing easy access to radicalism using personality profiles, social media use to influence political opinions, lack of critical social media literacies, and hoax flourish disinformation. Our research shows a knowledge gap in how disinformation directly shapes communal psychosocial narratives. We highlight the need for future research to explore and examine the antecedents, consequences, and impact of disinformation on social media and how it affects citizens’ cognition, critical thinking, and well-being.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Media Technology,Education,Communication
Reference73 articles.
1. Acker, A., & Donovan, J. (2019). Data craft: A theory/methods package for critical internet studies. Information Communication and Society, 22(11), 1590-1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1645194
2. Aparici, R., García-Marín, D., & Rincón-Manzano, L. (2019). Noticias falsas, bulos y trending topics. Anatomía y estrategias de la desinformación en el conflicto Catalán [Fake news, hoaxes, and trending topics. Anatomy and strategies of disinformation in the Catalan conflict]. El Profesional de la Información [The Information Professional], 28(3), e0280313. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.13
3. Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin, & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 154-196). Guilford Publications.
4. Barr, S. (2018). When did Facebook start? The story behind a company that took over the world. Independent. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/facebook-when-started-how-mark-zuckerberg-history-harvard-eduardo-saverin-a8505151.html
5. Bastos, M., & Mercea, D. (2018). The public accountability of social platforms: Lessons from a study on bots and trolls in the Brexit campaign. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), 20180003. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0003
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献