Uptake and adoption of the NHS App in England: an observational study

Author:

KC SukritiORCID,Tewolde SalinaORCID,Laverty Anthony AORCID,Costelloe CéireORCID,Papoutsi ChrysanthiORCID,Reidy ClaireORCID,Gudgin BernardORCID,Shenton CraigORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Powell JohnORCID,Greaves FelixORCID

Abstract

BackgroundTechnological advances have led to the use of patient portals that give people digital access to their personal health information. The NHS App was launched in January 2019 as a ‘front door’ to digitally enabled health services.AimTo evaluate patterns of uptake of the NHS App, subgroup differences in registration, and the impact of COVID-19.Design and settingAn observational study using monthly NHS App user data at general-practice level in England was conducted.MethodDescriptive statistics and time-series analysis explored monthly NHS App use from January 2019–May 2021. Interrupted time-series models were used to identify changes in the level and trend of use of different functionalities, before and after the first COVID-19 lockdown. Negative binomial regression assessed differences in app registration by markers of general-practice level sociodemographic variables.ResultBetween January 2019 and May 2021, there were 8 524 882 NHS App downloads and 4 449 869 registrations, with a 4-fold increase in App downloads when the COVID Pass feature was introduced. Analyses by sociodemographic data found 25% lower registrations in the most deprived practices (P<0.001), and 44% more registrations in the largest sized practices (P<0.001). Registration rates were 36% higher in practices with the highest proportion of registered White patients (P<0.001), 23% higher in practices with the largest proportion of 15–34-year-olds (P<0.001) and 2% lower in practices with highest proportion of people with long-term care needs (P<0.001).ConclusionThe uptake of the NHS App substantially increased post-lockdown, most significantly after the NHS COVID Pass feature was introduced. An unequal pattern of app registration was identified, and the use of different functions varied. Further research is needed to understand these patterns of inequalities and their impact on patient experience.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3