The conundrum of acute chest pain in general practice: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands

Author:

Harskamp Ralf,van Peet Petra,Bont Jettie,Ligthart Suzanne,Lucassen Wim,van Weert Henk

Abstract

BackgroundGPs are frequently confronted with patients with acute onset chest pain. Although usually benign, approximately 5% is due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Unfortunately, ACS is not always recognised, leading to a missed diagnosis in 2–5% of presentations.AimThe authors set out to study the level of risk GPs are willing to accept with regards to missing an ACS diagnosis, and the receptiveness of implementing new clinical decision aids.Design & settingThis study involved an online survey among GPs in the Netherlands.MethodA concept survey was constructed, which was tested among a panel of 24 GPs. The survey was then modified to achieve content validity. This survey was electronically distributed among 1000 GPs.ResultsA total of 313 (31.3%) GPs completed the survey. Of those surveyed, the median age was 50 years (interquartile range 41–57), 53.0% were female, and 6.4% were specialist GPs ('kaderarts') in cardiology or acute care. GPs estimated the missed ACS rate to be <5.0% in clinical practice, most often estimating a chance of 1.0–2.5% (35.2%) or 0.5–1.0% (29.7%). For atypical case presentations, 70% of GPs would accept a 0.1–1.0% missed diagnosis rate, while keeping the referral threshold to a maximum of 50 unnecessary referrals for each ACS case (75% of responders). GPs would welcome additional decision aids, with 79.2% favouring a clinical decision aid, 77.1% favouring troponin point-of-care (POC) testing, and 85.5% favoring a combination of a clinical decision aid and a troponin POC test.ConclusionGPs perceive that they miss more ACS cases than they feel comfortable with, which is reflected in a defensive referral strategy. The vast majority of GPs would welcome the use of clinical decision aids and/or cardiac biomarker POC testing for ruling out ACS, if accompanied by more certainty than based on clinical judgment alone.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference23 articles.

1. Causes of chest pain in primary care – a systematic review and meta-analysis

2. Frequency of chest pain in primary care, diagnostic tests performed and final diagnoses

3. Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care;Nilsson;Br J Gen Pract,2003

4. Chest pain in daily practice: occurrence, causes and management;Verdon;Swiss Med Wkly,2008

5. van Hassel DTP Kasteleijn A Kenens RJ (2016) Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen [Data from general practice records]. (accessed 20 Nov 2018). https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/cijfers-uit-de-registratie-van-huisartsen-peiling-jan-2015.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3