Affiliation:
1. PhD candidate, KU Leuven, Department of Architecture, Belgium
2. Associate Professor, KU Leuven, Department of Architecture, Belgium
Abstract
The destruction of the West Flemish city of Ypres, Belgium, caused by the violent battles of the First World War, sparked an intense debate on urban reconstruction strategies. The disruptive consequences forced the government to provide a rapid, large-scale response while choosing between preserving the past or ambitiously embracing the future, thus following the main discourses among urban planners of that time. Beyond this emergency phase, however, more in-depth questioning about national identity and people’s sense of place arose, which translated into embraced or rejected architectural styles and urban planning proposals. The interplay between remembering and forgetting exhibited divergent urban planning proposals, which made the decision on how to rebuild the city difficult, delaying the reconstruction process. Since opinions on what to remember rely on people’s personal sense of remembrance, the spatial translation of how to remember requires a multi-layered approach where spaces for memory, such as memorials, cemeteries and monuments, and memories of places that relate to experiences in the everyday life of the residents, intertwine. When the spatial translation of these spaces for memory and places to which individual memories are attached is unbalanced, it might counteract the residents’ recovery while hindering the restoration of their broken journeys. This article elaborates on how this spatial translation proceeded within the reconstruction of Ypres, known as ‘the city of peace’, where the war memory became part of the identity of the place, which up until today attracts many international war tourists.
Reference46 articles.
1. ‘Kitsch geographies and the everyday spaces of social memory’;Atkinson
David;Environment and Planning A,2007
2. Baillieul
Jean-Marie
‘Problematiek omtrent de wederopbouw van België Na de Eerste Wereldoorlog : Casus Ieper en omgeving (1918–1924)’ [Problems concerning the reconstruction of Belgium after the First World War : Case study Ypres and its surroundings (1918–1924)]
Master’s thesis
Ghent University
Ghent
1976
3. ‘Recht op herstel? De Belgische regering staat op de rem bij het vergoeden van de geteisterden’ [Right to recovery? The Belgian government is holding back on compensating those affected];Baillieul
Jean-Marie
Baert
Koen
Chielens
Piet
Constandt
Hugo
Dendooven
Dominiek
Dewilde
Jan
Tzalmona
Rose
Vandenbilcke
Annick
Vanhove
Jean-Luc,1998
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献