Strategies for Activating Public-Private Partnerships of Social Service Provision of Indigenous Regions in Taiwan

Author:

HWANG Yuan-shie,CHUANG Li-hsin

Abstract

Compared with the mainstream society, the distinctively geographical, social and cultural environment of Taiwan's indigenous regions has caused many difficulties in social service provision. The model of public-private partnerships (PPPs) has been regarded as a main strategy to alleviate the difficulties. By adopting the qualitative research method and collecting data through individual in-depth interview (18 peoples) and focus group (2 groups with 11 peoples), this study aims to explore the operation and interaction of public sectors, non-profit organizations and grassroots groups in the indigenous regions, and to identify their internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis) that affect social service provision, and further, to propose strategies related to activating PPPs. Based on the findings, we propose six discussions and suggestions for activating PPPs of social service provision of indigenous regions in Taiwan.

Publisher

Masaryk University Press

Reference26 articles.

1. [1] CHAN, Y.C. 2011. The cognizance and expectations of ethnic welfare policy toward indigenous people. Taiwan Indigenous Studies Review. 4(4), pp.85-108. (in Chinese)

2. [2] CHUANG, L.H. 2018. The dilemma and countermeasures of tribal governance in indigenous tribes: An analysis of indigenous perspectives. In Hwang Y.S., Chan Y.C. (Eds.), Indigenous Welfare, Well-Being and Tribal Governance. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery, pp.39-79. (in Chinese)

3. [3] CHEN, Z. Y. 2018. The dilemma of promoting the community-based day care services in the indigenous tribes. In Hwang Y.S., Chan, Y.C. (Eds.), Indigenous Welfare, Well-Being and Tribal Governance. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery, pp. 39-79. (in Chinese)

4. [4] CLARKE, A., MacDONALD, A. 2019. Outcomes to partners in multi-stakeholder cross-sector partnerships: A resource-based view. Business & Society. 58(2), pp.298-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660534

5. [5] BOVAIRD, T., DICKINSON, H., ALLEN, K. 2012, New models of strategic commissioning. In Glasby J (Ed.): Commissioning for Health and Well-Being: An introduction. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp.19-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660534

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3