Inpatient Gastroenterology Consults Have Little Utility Before Transesophageal Echocardiograms in a Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Mizrahi Joseph1ORCID,Marhaba Jade2,Paradkar Anika3ORCID,Klyachman Leslie2ORCID,Menashe Eyal2,Jamorabo Daniel S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA;

2. Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA;

3. Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the well-documented safety of transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs), inpatient gastroenterology (GI) services are called to clear patients for the procedure when they have GI symptoms or comorbidities ranging from mild to clinically significant. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of such consults in preventing TEE complications. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of all inpatients at our institution who had a TEE ordered from 7/1/2021 through 7/1/2022. Patients' demographic information, indications for TEE, complications from TEE, 30-day readmission rates, GI team recommendations, and results of any GI-related interventions were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There were 732 patients who had a TEE ordered during our study period, of whom 641 (87.51%) underwent the procedure. Of the 91 (12.49%) who did not have a TEE, none were canceled due to a GI-related concern. There were 23 of 641 patients (3.59%) with complications from the TEE, none of which were GI-related. The GI team was consulted on 36 patients (4.96% of TEEs ordered) and cleared 22 of 36 (61.11%) with no further testing while the remaining 14 of 36 patients (38.89%) underwent workups that were largely normal. Patients who had a GI consult before their TEE had a significantly longer time between their TEE being ordered and the TEE being performed compared with those who did not have a GI consult before their TEE (4.50 days vs 0.77 days, P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Inpatient GI team workups to clear patients for a TEE found no contraindications to TEEs, did not change patient care plans, and led to increased hospital costs and lengths of stay.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3