Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Yakoubovitch Stephanie1,Zaki Timothy2ORCID,Anand Sanya3,Pecoriello Jillian4,Liang Peter S.56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA;

2. Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA;

3. Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA;

4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA;

5. Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA;

6. Department of Medicine, VA New York Harbor Health Care System, New York, New York, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Screening decreases colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, but uptake in the United States remains suboptimal. Prior studies have investigated the effect of various interventions on overall colorectal cancer screening and stool-based testing, but the effect on colonoscopy—the predominant screening test in the United States—has not been fully examined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of behavioral interventions on screening colonoscopy uptake. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through January 2022 for controlled trials that assessed the effect of behavioral interventions on screening colonoscopy uptake. All titles, abstracts, and articles were screened by at least 2 independent reviewers. Odds ratios were extracted from the original article or calculated from the raw data. The primary outcome was the relative increase in screening colonoscopy completion with any behavioral intervention. We performed random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analysis by type of intervention. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies with 30 behavioral interventions were analyzed. The most common interventions were patient navigation (n = 11) and multicomponent interventions (n = 6). Overall, behavioral interventions increased colonoscopy completion by 54% compared with controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–1.88). Patient navigation (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.35–2.34) and multicomponent interventions (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17–2.89) had the strongest effect on colonoscopy completion among interventions examined in multiple studies. Significant heterogeneity was observed both overall and by intervention type. There was no evidence of publication bias. DISCUSSION: Behavioral interventions increase screening colonoscopy completion and should be adopted in clinical practice. In particular, patient navigation and multicomponent interventions are the best-studied and most effective interventions.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Endoscopy: Scoping the Way Forward;American Journal of Gastroenterology;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3