Affiliation:
1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Saint-Petersburg State University"
Abstract
The radial (transversal) anisotropy of the Earth’s upper mantle was found by comparing the velocity sections of transverse waves obtained by inverse of the dispersion curves of Rayleigh and Love waves. Information on variations in anisotropy with depth was obtained from dispersion curves on fairly uniform oceanic paths. In the oceanic mantle the SH wave velocities obtained from the Love wave data are greater than the SV wave velocities determined from Rayleigh waves, so that the anisotropy coefficient is positive and is about 4% under the Moho boundary and decreases to zero at a depth of about 200 km. The information about the anisotropy of the continents is much more scarce and often contradictory due to a strong lateral inhomogeneity of the crust and upper mantle of the continents. In the European region, some authors reveal the zones where VSV>VSH in the upper mantle, whereas some others confirm VSH>VSV to be everywhere. The uncertainty in the observed values of the anisotropy coefficient is explained by the fact that it was always determined from the results of the Rayleigh and Love wave velocity tomography carried out on the basis of different samples of paths. Accordingly, the values of the SH and SV wave velocities turned out to be averaged over different regions, which led to errors in the estimates of the anisotropy coefficient. To reduce these errors, we proposed an alternative method for estimating the spatial distribution of the anisotropy coefficient: to estimate the anisotropy co-efficient in the beginning at each path and then to fulfill the tomographic inversion for this coefficient. Preliminary results on the distribution of the anisotropy coefficient in the upper mantle of Europe were presented according to an earthquake and seismic noise. However, analysis of the anisotropy coefficient values obtained from the earthquake data and seismic noise has shown that those obtained from noise are usually underestimated. Therefore, in the present study, we used only the data obtained from earthquakes. It was shown that the anisotropy coefficient under the continental part of the European region is close to zero but two areas where VSV>VSH are detected – in the central part of EEP and in southern Italy. In both cases, the negative values of the anisotropy coefficient are observed within the interval of ~60–100 km depth.
Funder
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Publisher
Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences - GS RAS
Reference16 articles.
1. Anderson, D.L. (1965). Recent evidence concerning the structure and composition of the Earth’s mantle. Phys-ics and Chemistry of the Earth, 6, 1-131. doi: 10.1016/0079-1946(65)90013-3
2. Anderson, D.L., & Regan, J. (1983). Uppermantle anisotropy and the oceanic lithosphere. Geophysical Re-search Letters, 10(9), 841-843. doi: 10.1029/GL010i009p00841
3. Chang, S.J., van der Lee, S., Matzel, E., & Bedle, H. (2010). Radial anisotropy along the Tethyan margin. Geo-physical Journal International, 182(2), 1013-1024. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04662.x
4. Chen, Y., Badal, J., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Radial anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle beneath the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and surrounding regions. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 36, 289-302. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.06.011
5. Ditmar, P.G., & Yanovskaya, T.B. (1987). A generalization of the Backus-Gilbert method for estimation of lat-eral variations of surface wave velocity. Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth, 23(6), 470-480.