JOB ROTATION APPROACH AMONG NURSES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: to compare the perceived levels of job rotation, job satisfaction, and job conflict between two groups of nurses in Jordan, and to explore the differences between them. Moreover, several demographic factors were examined to investigate their association with job rotation approach in nurses who previously had job rotation experience. Method: a cross-sectional design with a total of 244 nurses: 122 nurses had experienced job rotation while 122 nurses never had experienced job rotation. The study was examined between January and February in the year of 2020. Job rotation scale, job satisfaction scale, and job conflict scale were used to assess the three variables. Independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance test were used to analyze significant differences between both selected groups. Results: statistical analysis indicated that nurses who underwent job rotation had significantly higher perceived levels of job rotation, job satisfaction, and lower level of job conflict compared to other nurses who did not experience job rotation. Moreover, gender, experience, and educational level were significantly associated with the perceived level of job rotation among nurses who had job rotation experience in Jordan. Job rotation was not found to be associated with marital status. Conclusions: job rotation approach is necessary to improve job satisfaction and reduce job conflict. Nursing directors should cooperate to apply nurses’ rotation approach at hospitals in order to increase job satisfaction and decrease the level of job conflict.