Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil; Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify criteria used nationally and internationally to classify degrees of hearing loss, compare them with what is established in the Brazilian law, and discuss possible consequences of such a law on the social protection of people with hearing loss. Methods: a narrative review was conducted to identify the criteria used in this classification, by searching the platforms VHL and PubMed in April 2020. It included primary human research explicitly mentioning the criteria used to classify the degree of hearing loss, published between 2015 and 2019 in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Literature Review: there is a preference for the four-frequency mean at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The Brazilian law does not follow these criteria, which may pose a barrier to people with hearing loss, hindering their access to social protection programs. Final Considerations: there is no consensus on the best criteria, although the most encompassing ones in hearing assessment predominate - which are not the ones legally used in Brazil. It is necessary to debate the Brazilian legal criteria to ensure existing social rights to part of people with hearing loss in Brazil.
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry,General Medicine
Reference61 articles.
1. Releitura dos dados de pessoas com deficiência no Censo demográfico 2010 à luz das recomendações do Grupo de Washington,2018
2. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2019,2021
3. Communication between deaf people who had early diagnosis and late diagnosis and their pairs;Rovere NV;Distúrb. Comum,2018
4. Auditory diagnosis: principles and applications;Silman S,1997
5. As implicações sociais da deficiência auditiva adquirida em adultos;Francelin MAS;Saude Soc.,2010