Evasion of Newborn Hearing Screening retest: relation with risk factors for hearing impairment

Author:

Pinto Júlia Dalcin1ORCID,Ferreira Laís1ORCID,Temp Déborah Aurélio1ORCID,Dias Valdani1ORCID,Rohers Dara Eliza1ORCID,Biaggio Eliara Pinto Vieira1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the evasion rate of the Newborn Hearing Screening program’s retest, to verify whether the presence of risk indicators for hearing loss influences it, and to describe which risk indicators for hearing loss occur more frequently in these cases. Methods: 1,287 newborns/infants participated, who were screened between June 2015 and June 2018. All of them obtained "fail" as the Newborn Hearing Screening result, were referred to the retest and did not attend it. Information related to the occurrence of risk indicators for hearing loss was observed. Results: the study found that the evasion rate was of 15.23%. The presence of risk indicators for hearing loss did not show an association with non-attendance at this stage of the program (p-value = 0.087). The most frequent indicators in the cases of non-attendance at the retest were: ototoxic medication use and intensive care unit stay for more than five days. Conclusion: high evasion rate of the retest has been observed. It has been found that the presence of risk indicators did not influence the retest evasion rate. Use of ototoxic medication and stay at the intensive care unit were the most frequent indicators among those who did not attend the retest.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference29 articles.

1. Language of early-and later-identified children with hearing loss;Yoshinaga-itano C;Pediatrics,1998

2. The impact of universal newborn hearing screening on long-term literacy outcomes: a prospective cohort study;Pimperton H;Arch Dis Child,2016

3. Diretrizes de Atenção da Triagem Auditiva Neonatal,2012

4. Global estimates on hearing loss. World Health Organization,2018

5. Public health approach to hearing across the life course: a call-for papers;Chadha S;Bull World Health Organ,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3