Affiliation:
1. Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Brazil
2. BNP Paribas Cardif, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT In line with the regulation brought in by Solvency II, the Superintendence of Private Insurance (Susep) introduced the market risk capital requirement at the end of 2015, with 50% of the minimum capital for this type of risk being required by December 31st 2016 and 100% the following year. This regulatory model consists of calculating parametric value at risk with a 99% confidence level and a three month time horizon, using the net exposure of expected cash flows from assets and liabilities and a covariance matrix updated with market data up to July 2014. One limitation of this regulatory approach is that the updating of the covariance matrix depends on prior approval by the National Council of Private Insurance, which can limit the frequency the covariance matrix is updated and the model’s adherence to the current market reality. As this matrix considers the period before the presidential election, the country’s loss of investment grade status, and the impeachment process, which all contributed to an increase in market volatility, this paper analyses the impacts of applying the regulatory model, considering the market volatility updated to December 31st 2015, for a special savings company (sociedade de capitalização), an insurance company, and an pension fund. Furthermore, the paper discusses the practical implications of the new market risk requirement for managing the investments of the entities supervised by Susep, listing the various assumptions that can be used in the regulated entities’ Asset and Liability Management decision models and possible trade-offs to be addressed in this process.
Reference21 articles.
1. Market risk analysis, value at risk models;Alexander C.,2009
2. International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework,2004
3. Pension metrics: stochastic pension plan design and value-at-risk during the accumulation phase;Blake D.;Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,2001
4. Stochastic life styling: optimal dynamic asset allocation for defined contribution pension plans;Cairns A. J.;Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2006
5. Alternative models for hedging yield curve risk: an empirical comparison;Carcano N.;Journal of Banking & Finance,2011
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献