Progress in animal experimentation ethics: a case study from a Brazilian medical school and from the international medical literature

Author:

Ramalli Jr. Edvaldo Luiz1,Ho Wanli1,Alves Mônica2,Rocha Eduardo Melani1

Affiliation:

1. USP, Brazil

2. Pontific Catholic University of Campinas

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study describes in Brazil and in the global biomedical community the time course of the development of animal research welfare guidelines. METHODS: The database of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto (EC/FMRP-USP), Brazil, was surveyed since its inception in 2002 as the regulations became more stringent to provide better protection of animal research welfare at this institution. Medline database was evaluated to identify the number of publications in the period between 1968 and 2008 that used research animals and were in compliance with established ethics guidelines. RESULTS: The EC/FMRP-USP evaluated 979 projects up until 2009. Most of the applications came from Department of Physiology and the most frequently requested species was the rat. In 2004, national research funding agencies started to request prior approval from institutional review ethics committees prior to application review and this requirement became federal law in Brazil in 2008. The analysis of international publications revealed a relative reduction in studies involving research animals (18% in 1968 to 7.5% in 2008). CONCLUSIONS: The present work showed that in the last four decades major changes occurred in the guidelines dictating use of research animals occurred and they are being adopted by developing countries. Moreover, animal welfare concern in the scientific community preceded the introduction of journal guidelines for this purpose. Furthermore, in Brazil it was anticipated that laws were needed to protect animal research welfare from being not upheld.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Surgery

Reference17 articles.

1. Researchers, animals activists fight public relations war at western;Johnston C;CMAJ,1993

2. The animal research war;Conn PM;Faseb J,2008

3. Animal experimentation: ethics and brazilian legislation;Rezende A;Rev Nutr Campinas,2008

4. Ética e pesquisa;Schnaider TB;Acta Cir Bras,2008

5. Uso de animais em cirurgia experimental;Schanaider A;Acta Cir Bras,2004

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ethical to using Rats in the Scientific Researches;Pharmacy & Pharmacology International Journal;2018-01-09

2. Animal experimentation: A look into ethics, welfare and alternative methods;Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira;2017-11

3. Use of Animal models in Experimental Research in Dentistry in Brazil;Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada;2014-03-30

4. Instrumental and ethical aspects of experimental research with animal models;Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP;2014-02

5. Laboratory animal: biological reagent or living being?;Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research;2013-12-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3