Impact of different search strategies on the results of a meta-analysis for mastitis in dairy cattle

Author:

Silva Danilo Pereira da1ORCID,Polycarpo Gustavo do Valle1ORCID,Aléssio Fraine Natacha1ORCID,Queiroz Alexandre de1ORCID,Maestá Sirlei Aparecida1ORCID,Fonseca Ricardo da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Poorly formulated search strategies can have great influences on the results of a meta-analysis, since it directly impacts the amount and adherence to the theme of the works used for study, therefore, the formulation of a consistent and functional search strategy is essential for the review system to achieve its goals. The objective of this work was to study the impact of different search strategies in a systematic review by performing a meta-analysis to estimate heritability for the mastitis trait in dairy cattle. Once the search strategies were defined, the searches carried out in the Web of science, Scopus, Scielo and Pubmed databases returned 921 studies from which, after going through the identification, selection, eligibility and inclusion processes, 25 studies were selected. Withdrawals from selected articles, 26 heritability estimates were used in the meta-analysis. A random effect model was used, with all analyzes performed by the R program, through the Metafor package. The estimates obtained through the combined statistics of studies for mastitis, presented values of low magnitude (0.05 and 0.06). The effects of search strategies have a significant impact on the meta-analysis estimates produced.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference32 articles.

1. Diretrizes metodológicas,2014

2. Meta-análise para estimativas de herdabilidade para características de crescimento em bovinos de corte;Giannotti JDG;Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia,2005

3. Reference manager. Version 5.0.95.1. Corporation for Digital Scholarship,2020

4. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis;Hedges LV;Psychological Methods,1998

5. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package;Viechtbauer W;Journal of Statistical Software,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3