Affiliation:
1. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Brasil
Abstract
Abstract This paper examines the behaviour of credit rating agencies (CRAs) during the ebbing ‘pink tide’. It claims that the actions of S&P Global, Moody’s and Fitch contributed to dismantling left-wing regimes in Latin America, to the benefit of their right-wing competitors. The methodology draws on case studies of Brazil and Argentina, where the governments of Dilma Rousseff and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner were replaced by those of Michel Temer and Mauricio Macri, respectively. The research is based on sovereign ratings, reports and press releases the agencies issued during those transitions, which are analysed in the light of critical theories of their modus operandi and confronted with the political processes unfolding in both countries. This allows us to draw conclusions that are consistent with the presented argument, thereby contributing to advance the research agenda around the CRAs and to shed light on Brazil and Argentina’s recent critical presidential transitions.
Reference84 articles.
1. International financial subordination: a critical research agenda;Alami I;Review of International Political Economy,2022
2. Rating politics? Partisan discrimination in credit ratings in developed economies;Barta Z;Comparative Political Studies,2017
3. Entitlements in the crosshairs: how sovereign credit ratings judge the welfare state in advanced market economies;Barta Z;Review of International Political Economy,2020
4. Rating Politics;Barta Z,2023
5. The politics of creditworthiness: political and policy commentary in sovereign credit rating reports;Barta Z K;Journal of Public Policy,2020