Inquiring into the Exemplary Spanish Theses of Mathematics Education: analysis of their scientific impact

Author:

Vallejo Mónica1ORCID,Torres-Soto Ana2ORCID,Curiel-Marín Elvira3ORCID,Ahumada Elvira Fernández de4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Granada, Spain; University of Murcia, Spain

2. University of Murcia, Spain

3. University of Granada, Spain

4. University of Córdoba, Spain

Abstract

Abstract Establishing criteria that determine the quality of any scientific publication is a fact agreed on by the entire scientific community in its different fields of knowledge. In the case of doctoral theses, these criteria may vary between universities, doctoral schools, or evaluation committees. This paper presents an evaluation criteria proposal for doctoral theses in the field of Mathematics Education. A total of 199 theses indexed in the TESEO database are analyzed, throughout the 2015-2020 period. Likewise, after applying these criteria, those theses that have been denominated as “exemplary” are identified in this evaluative proposal. The main results include the consolidation of two university research centers in the field of Mathematics Education. However, results show the scarce dissemination that is made of the investigations carried out from the doctoral works (102 out of 199 doctoral theses have not had any associated publication) apparently having, as the main objective, the achievement of the Doctor’s degree instead of the search for development and scientific advancement.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Education,Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Reference25 articles.

1. How interdisciplinarity helps knowledge production: Reflections on a doctoral dissertation;AJANOVIC E.;Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education,2021

2. An examination of education-based dissertation macrostructures;ANDERSON T.;Journal of English for Academic Purposes,2020

3. The Public Administration Doctoral Dissertation Reexamined: An Evaluation of the Dissertations of 1998;CLEARY R. E.;Public Administration Review,2000

4. New Trends in Qualitative Research,;CASASEMPERE-SATORRES A.,2020

5. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis;COOPER H.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3