Affiliation:
1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Brasil
2. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brasil
Abstract
Abstract The role of bioethics in promoting educative and deliberative spaces represents a demand to make the social inclusion of vulnerable groups viable. In this scope, and aiming to validate the method of applying deliberation in virtual environments, we carried out the third version of the “ O caminho do diálogo ” (The path of dialogue) action, which promoted, among older adults, a discussion about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the inclusion processes and, among bioethics academics, a debate on fragilities, ethical values, beliefs and potentialities of inclusion of animal protection, veganism, water crisis, mental health, multiple disabilities, refugees, homeless people, violence against women, sexuality and gender, and digital education. This article reports this interventions experience and discusses bioethics in the context of deliberation, intending not to formally work bioethics concepts, but to introduce the bioethical perspective by using interdisciplinary dialogue as a means of identifying vulnerabilities and debating solutions to promote inclusion.
Subject
Philosophy,Medicine (miscellaneous),Health (social science)
Reference38 articles.
1. Da ética ambiental à bioética ambiental: antecedentes, trajetórias e perspectivas;Fischer ML;Hist Ciênc Saúde,2016
2. O caminho do diálogo: proporcionando a vivência da bioética no ensino fundamental;Fischer ML,2017
3. O caminho do diálogo 2: promovendo a sinergia entre a bioética, os objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável e os estudantes do ensino médio;Fischer ML,2019
4. De la bioética clínica a la bioética global: treinta años de evolución;Gracia D;Acta Bioeth,2002
5. Falácia dilemática nas discussões da bioética;Junges JR;Rev. bioét. (Impr.),2019