Proposed diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder: A Delphi expert consensus study

Author:

Müller Astrid1ORCID,Laskowski Nora M.1,Trotzke Patrick23,Ali Kathina456,Fassnacht Daniel B.456,de Zwaan Martina1,Brand Matthias27,Häder Michael8,Kyrios Michael456

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany

2. 2General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

3. 3International University of Applied Sciences (IUBH), Cologne, Germany

4. 4College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

5. 5Órama Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

6. 6Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

7. 7Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany

8. 8Institute of Sociology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimsConsensus in acknowledging compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) as a distinct diagnosis has been lacking. Before research in this area can be advanced, it is necessary to establish diagnostic criteria in order to facilitate field trials.MethodsThe study consisted of the following phases: (1) operationalization of a broad range of potential diagnostic criteria for CBSD, (2) two iterative rounds of data collection using the Delphi method, where consensus of potential diagnostic criteria for CBSD was reached by an international expert panel, and (3) interpretation of findings taking into account the degree of certainty amongst experts regarding their responses.ResultsWith respect to diagnostic criteria, there was clear expert consensus about inclusion of the persistent and recurrent experience of (a) intrusive and/or irresistible urges and/or impulses and/or cravings and/or preoccupations for buying/shopping; (b) diminished control over buying/shopping; (c) excessive purchasing of items without utilizing them for their intended purposes, (d) use of buying-shopping to regulate internal states; (e) negative consequences and impairment in important areas of functioning due to buying/shopping; (f) emotional and cognitive symptoms upon cessation of excessive buying/shopping; and (g) maintenance or escalation of dysfunctional buying/shopping behaviors despite negative consequences. Furthermore, support was found for a specifier related to the presence of excessive hoarding of purchased items.ConclusionsThe proposed diagnostic criteria can be used as the basis for the development of diagnostic interviews and measures of CBSD severity.

Publisher

Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3