Affiliation:
1. 1 Neccton Ltd., London, UK
2. 2 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
Abstract
Background
Over the past two decades, problem gambling has become a public health issue and research from many countries indicates that a small but significant minority of individuals are problem gamblers. In Norway, the prevalence of problem gambling among adults is estimated to be just less than 1%. To help minimize the harm from gambling, the Norwegian government’s gambling operator (Norsk Tipping) has introduced several responsible gambling initiatives to help protect players from developing gambling problems (e.g., limit-setting tools, voluntary self-exclusion, personalized feedback, etc.).
Aim
The aim of this study was to determine whether the receiving of personalized feedback exceeding 80% of a personally set monetary personal limit had an effect on subsequent playing behavior compared to those gamblers who did not receive personalized feedback.
Methods
Out of 54,002 players, a total of 7,884 players (14.5%) received at least one piece of feedback that they had exceeded 80% of their personal global monthly loss limit between January and March 2017.
Results
Using a matched-pairs design, results showed that those gamblers receiving personalized feedback in relation to limit-setting showed significant reductions in the amount of money gambled.
Conclusion
The findings of this study will be of great value to many stakeholder groups including researchers in the gambling studies field, the gambling industry, regulators, and policymakers.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference112 articles.
1. Usage of a responsible gambling tool: A descriptive analysis of latent class analysis of user behavior;Forsström;Journal of Gambling Studies,,2016
2. The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT);Freedman;Controlled Clinical Trials,,1997
3. Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: An empirical study of gambling behaviour;Auer;Journal of Gambling Studies,,2013
4. An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity;Auer;Journal of Gambling Studies,,2014
5. Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study;Smeaton;CyberPsychology & Behavior,,2004
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献