Affiliation:
1. Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
2. Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONT N2L 3G1, Canada
3. International Union of Geological Sciences Commission on Global Geochemical Baselines, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033, USA
Abstract
A novel method of estimating the silica (SiO
2
) and loss-on-ignition (LOI) concentrations for the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes (NASGL) project datasets is proposed. Combining the precision of the geochemical determinations with the completeness of the mineralogical NASGL data, we suggest a ‘reverse normative’ or inversion approach to first calculate the minimum SiO
2
, water (H
2
O) and carbon dioxide (CO
2
) concentrations in weight percent (wt%) in these samples. These can be used in a first step to compute minimum and maximum estimates for SiO
2
. In a recursive step, a ‘consensus’ SiO
2
is then established as the average between the two aforementioned SiO
2
estimates, trimmed as necessary to yield a total composition (major oxides converted from reported Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S and Ti elemental concentrations + ‘consensus’ SiO
2
+ reported trace element concentrations converted to wt% + ‘normative’ H
2
O + ‘normative’ CO
2
) of no more than 100 wt%. Any remaining compositional gap between 100 wt% and this sum is considered ‘other’ LOI and likely includes H
2
O and CO
2
from the reported ‘amorphous’ phase (of unknown geochemical or mineralogical composition) as well as other volatile components present in soil. We validate the technique against a separate dataset from Australia where geochemical (including all major oxides) and mineralogical data exist on the same samples. The correlation between predicted and observed SiO
2
is linear, strong (
R
2
= 0.91) and homoscedastic. We also compare the estimated NASGL SiO
2
concentrations with a sparser, publicly available continental-scale survey over the conterminous USA, the ‘Shacklette and Boerngen’ dataset. This comparison shows the new data to be a reasonable representation of SiO
2
values measured on the ground over the conterminous USA. We recommend the approach of combining geochemical and mineralogical information to estimate missing SiO
2
and LOI by the recursive inversion approach in datasets elsewhere, with the caveat to always validate results.
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Geochemistry and Petrology,General Environmental Science,General Chemistry
Reference30 articles.
1. AAT Bioquest 2023. Quest Graph™ Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) Test Calculator https://www.aatbio.com/tools/kolmogorov-smirnov-k-s-test-calculator
2. Achilles C.N. Downs G.W. et al. 2018. Amorphous phase characterization through X-ray diffraction profile modeling: implications for amorphous phases in Gale Crater rocks and soils. 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference LPI Contribution 2083 Texas 19–23 March. 2661 https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2018/pdf/2661.pdf
3. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
4. Normative Mineralogy of 1170 Soil Profiles across Canada
5. Blake D. and Kilgour B. 1998. Geological Regions of Australia 1:5 000 000 Scale. Geoscience Australia Dataset http://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/32366