ChatGPT Performance on MCQ Exams in Higher Education. A Pragmatic Scoping Review

Author:

Newton Philip MarkORCID,Xiromeriti Maira

Abstract

Background. Media coverage suggests that ChatGPT can pass exams based on Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs), including those used to qualify doctors, lawyers, scientists etc. Objectives. We aimed to review current research evidence regarding the performance of ChatGPT on MCQ-based exams, along with recommendations for how educators might address the challenges and benefits of ChatGPT.Eligibility Criteria. Studies testing the performance of ChatGPT on MCQ-based exams in Higher Education. All disciplines and languages were included although the research itself was published in English.Results. 53 studies were included, covering 114 question sets, totalling 49014 MCQs. Free versions of ChatGPT based upon GPT-3/3.5 performed better than random guessing but failed most exams, performing significantly worse than the average human student. GPT-4 passed most exams with a performance that was on a par with human subjects. Conclusions. All summative MCQ-based assessments should be conducted under secure conditions with restricted access to ChatGPT and similar tools, particularly those which assess foundational knowledge. Authentic assessments could incorporate student use of ChatGPT since, due to its excellent performance, graduates will almost certainly be using it in practice.

Publisher

Center for Open Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3