Framework for Assessing the Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Removal Options Within the National Context of Germany

Author:

Förster Johannes,Beck Silke,Borchers Malgorzata,Gawel Erik,Korte Klaas,Markus Till,Mengis Nadine,Oschlies Andreas,Schaller Romina,Stevenson Angela,Thoni Terese,Thrän Daniela

Abstract

Removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will be required over the next decades to achieve the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C aiming at not exceeding 1.5°C. Technological and ecosystem-based options are considered for generating negative emissions through carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and several nations have already included these in their Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategies. However, strategies for development, implementation, and upscaling of CDR options often remain vague. Considering the scale at which CDR deployment is envisioned in emission pathways for limiting global warming to 1.5°C, significant environmental, social, and institutional implications are to be expected and need to be included in national feasibility assessments of CDR options. Following a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach, we created a framework that considers the environmental, technological, economic, social, institutional, and systemic implications of upscaling CDR options. We propose the framework as a tool to help guide decision-relevant feasibility assessments of CDR options, as well as identify challenges and opportunities within the national context. As such, the framework can serve as a means to inform and support decision makers and stakeholders in the iterative science-policy process of determining the role of CDR options in national strategies of achieving net-zero carbon emissions.

Funder

Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference97 articles.

1. Technologieneutralität im Kontext der Verkehrswende.

2. Technology Neutrality for Sustainable Transport. Critical Assessment of a Postulate - Summary

3. ArmeniC. RedgewellC. Assessment of International Treaties Applicable, or at Least Adaptable, to Geoengineering-Related Activities through Indicators.2015

4. Engineering climate debt: temperature overshoot and peak-shaving as risky subprime mortgage lending;Asayama;Clim.ate Policy,2019

5. The road to paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-copenhagen era;Bäckstrand;J. Environ. Policy Plann.,2019

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3