Author:
Förster Johannes,Beck Silke,Borchers Malgorzata,Gawel Erik,Korte Klaas,Markus Till,Mengis Nadine,Oschlies Andreas,Schaller Romina,Stevenson Angela,Thoni Terese,Thrän Daniela
Abstract
Removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will be required over the next decades to achieve the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C aiming at not exceeding 1.5°C. Technological and ecosystem-based options are considered for generating negative emissions through carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and several nations have already included these in their Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategies. However, strategies for development, implementation, and upscaling of CDR options often remain vague. Considering the scale at which CDR deployment is envisioned in emission pathways for limiting global warming to 1.5°C, significant environmental, social, and institutional implications are to be expected and need to be included in national feasibility assessments of CDR options. Following a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach, we created a framework that considers the environmental, technological, economic, social, institutional, and systemic implications of upscaling CDR options. We propose the framework as a tool to help guide decision-relevant feasibility assessments of CDR options, as well as identify challenges and opportunities within the national context. As such, the framework can serve as a means to inform and support decision makers and stakeholders in the iterative science-policy process of determining the role of CDR options in national strategies of achieving net-zero carbon emissions.
Reference97 articles.
1. Technologieneutralität im Kontext der Verkehrswende.
2. Technology Neutrality for Sustainable Transport. Critical Assessment of a Postulate - Summary
3. ArmeniC.
RedgewellC.
Assessment of International Treaties Applicable, or at Least Adaptable, to Geoengineering-Related Activities through Indicators.2015
4. Engineering climate debt: temperature overshoot and peak-shaving as risky subprime mortgage lending;Asayama;Clim.ate Policy,2019
5. The road to paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-copenhagen era;Bäckstrand;J. Environ. Policy Plann.,2019
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献