Author:
Anderson Erin,Ringer James
Abstract
IntroductionThis paper explores organizational resilience by applying the theory of social embeddedness of thriving at work from the positive organizational psychology research through a cross-case comparison of five schools involved in improvement work during the pandemic.MethodsUsing document analysis, observation, and interviews, this study is framed through the literature on workplace stress in schools under pressure and argues that schools with limited resources, such as schools in need of improvement, need to rethink how educators spend time together to improve together if we hope to retain thriving (energetic, motivated, and cognitively engaged) educators.FindingsThe findings focus on collective thriving as demonstrated through the work behaviors embedded in equity-focused improvement in teams (Design Improvement). We explore what collective thriving looks like in two of the five schools, including a discussion of the resources produced from the equity-centered continuous improvement work that supports thriving. Lastly, we provide a comparative analysis of the contextual factors that led to these two schools thriving during this time, as compared to other schools in their cohort.DiscussionThe two schools collectively thrived during the 2020–21 schools year through (a) a systematic approach with common, transparent routines, and (b) inclusive social learning through collective and multiple perspectives.
Reference56 articles.
1. AnaissieT.
CaryV.
CliffordD.
MalarkeyT.
WiseS.
Liberatory Design2021
2. Leading Continuous Improvement in Schools
3. “Designing for equity: adaptive change through continuous improvement,”;Anderson,2020