Author:
Žuljević Marija Franka,Breški Nando,Kaliterna Mariano,Hren Darko
Abstract
Introduction and aimIt is important to understand how mental health practitioners view recent findings on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) as there is potential this treatment may be incorporated into clinical practice. The aim of our study was to explore how psychiatrists who are not involved in psychedelic research and who are located in the European region perceive psychedelics and PAP.MethodsWe conducted online semi-structured interviews with 12 psychiatry specialists and psychiatry trainees from 8 European countries. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach informed by codebook thematic analysis.ResultsBased on the interviews, we developed four main themes and 14 sub-themes, including (1) Psychedelics hold potential, (2) Psychedelics are dangerous, (3) Future of psychedelics is uncertain, and (4) Psychiatry is ambivalent toward psychedelics.DiscussionOur respondents-psychiatrists acknowledged the potential of PAP but remained cautious and did not yet perceive its evidence base as robust enough. Education on psychedelics is lacking in medical and psychiatric training and should be improved to facilitate the involvement of mental health experts in decision-making on PAP.
Reference38 articles.
1. Classic psychedelics: an integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function;Johnson;Pharmacol Ther,2019
2. The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: past, present, and future;Carhart-Harris;Neuropsychopharmacology,2017
3. Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: A systematic review;Schimmers;Psychopharmacology,2022
4. Psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Ko;J Affect Dis,2023
5. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review with meta-analysis;Smith;J Clin Pharmacol,2022