Author:
Salis Francesca,Bertuletti Stefano,Bonci Tecla,Caruso Marco,Scott Kirsty,Alcock Lisa,Buckley Ellen,Gazit Eran,Hansen Clint,Schwickert Lars,Aminian Kamiar,Becker Clemens,Brown Philip,Carsin Anne-Elie,Caulfield Brian,Chiari Lorenzo,D’Ascanio Ilaria,Del Din Silvia,Eskofier Bjoern M.,Garcia-Aymerich Judith,Hausdorff Jeffrey M.,Hume Emily C.,Kirk Cameron,Kluge Felix,Koch Sarah,Kuederle Arne,Maetzler Walter,Micó-Amigo Encarna M.,Mueller Arne,Neatrour Isabel,Paraschiv-Ionescu Anisoara,Palmerini Luca,Yarnall Alison J.,Rochester Lynn,Sharrack Basil,Singleton David,Vereijken Beatrix,Vogiatzis Ioannis,Della Croce Ugo,Mazzà Claudia,Cereatti Andrea,for the Mobilise-D consortium
Abstract
Introduction: Accurately assessing people’s gait, especially in real-world conditions and in case of impaired mobility, is still a challenge due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors resulting in gait complexity. To improve the estimation of gait-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) in real-world scenarios, this study presents a wearable multi-sensor system (INDIP), integrating complementary sensing approaches (two plantar pressure insoles, three inertial units and two distance sensors).Methods: The INDIP technical validity was assessed against stereophotogrammetry during a laboratory experimental protocol comprising structured tests (including continuous curvilinear and rectilinear walking and steps) and a simulation of daily-life activities (including intermittent gait and short walking bouts). To evaluate its performance on various gait patterns, data were collected on 128 participants from seven cohorts: healthy young and older adults, patients with Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and proximal femur fracture. Moreover, INDIP usability was evaluated by recording 2.5-h of real-world unsupervised activity.Results and discussion: Excellent absolute agreement (ICC >0.95) and very limited mean absolute errors were observed for all cohorts and digital mobility outcomes (cadence ≤0.61 steps/min, stride length ≤0.02 m, walking speed ≤0.02 m/s) in the structured tests. Larger, but limited, errors were observed during the daily-life simulation (cadence 2.72–4.87 steps/min, stride length 0.04–0.06 m, walking speed 0.03–0.05 m/s). Neither major technical nor usability issues were declared during the 2.5-h acquisitions. Therefore, the INDIP system can be considered a valid and feasible solution to collect reference data for analyzing gait in real-world conditions.
Funder
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Horizon 2020
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,Histology,Bioengineering,Biotechnology